This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: 2.13.1pre1 available
- From: "Graeme Peterson" <gp at qnx dot com>
- To: drow at mvista dot com (Daniel Jacobowitz)
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:04:06 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: 2.13.1pre1 available
Ok, I will check that one.
Yup, waiting for development branch approval of the patch resolves
my concern also - I just want to avoid versionitis.
;-)
Cheers,
GP
>
> Graeme,
>
> Sorry, I should have been clearer. binutils-021031.tar.bz2 is a
> snapshot from the development branch; I was talking about
> binutils-2.13.1pre1.tar.bz2, which is from the release branch.
>
> Also, I don't want to apply it to the release branch until someone
> approves it for the development trunk. I think it's reasonable...
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 03:47:55PM -0500, Graeme Peterson wrote:
> > Hi, Daniel.
> >
> > The binutils-021031.tar.bz2 that I downloaded from the snapshots site has
> > all of the currently supported QNX targets in it. The patch I submitted
> > to remove the extensions and clean up the base support applied cleanly.
> >
> > The patch is at:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-10/msg00676.html
> >
> > And the fix for the ChangeLog entry is in the followup.
> >
> > Please let me know if this is OK. If it is, then I think the patch should
> > be applied to the head branch as well so that they will be in sync.
> >
> > Cheers.
> > GP
> >
> > >
> > > Ok. I will get a copy of the source from the snapshots ftp site you mention
> > > below and make a patch in the morning.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > GP
> > >
> > > Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
> > >
> > > > Could you make the patch against the 2.13 branch, then? Only i386/qnx
> > > > is in 2.13 at all right now, and it's not in the same place it was when
> > > > you removed it.
> > > >
> > > > I wouldn't mind adding basic QNX targets to 2.13.1.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:26:54PM -0000, gp@qnx.com wrote:
> > > > > Any chance of my patch that removes the QNX bfd extensions and uses the
> > > base
> > > > > bfd vectors making it into 2.13.1?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > GP
> > > > >
> > > > > Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In the usual place:
> > > > > > ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/binutils/snapshots/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm hoping to look at the reported sparc64 problems before releasing
> > > 2.13.1,
> > > > > > but I haven't had much luck reproducing them so it may not happen. Test
> > > > > > and problem reports for other platforms are welcome.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Daniel Jacobowitz
> > > > > > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Daniel Jacobowitz
> > > > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
>