This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bug in gas generating sh PIC, or is it me?


Thanks, Dan.

I'm pretty sure that I tried this with the head branch from the GNU cvs, and 
observed the same thing - the value that gets put in the .o (and then 
the .so) for the jump into the .plt is 2 too big.  I'm just hoping for some 
pointers on how to fix it, and confirmation/correction on whether it is a 
binutils bug, so that the fix can get rolled in if appropriate.

Cheers.
GP

Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> said:

> Graeme Peterson wrote:
> > I think I may have found a bug in the sh PIC stuff in gas.  Or I may have 
> > a bug in the QNX sh-nto support.  Not sure which, and so this e-mail.  ;-)
> > 
> > Basically it looks like an "off by 2" bug to me.  If I have a source
> > file which I compile PIC into a shared object, any function calls from
> > that shared object into other PIC code blows up.  I can call from main()
> > into the shared object fine if the .so does not call any other PIC 
> > code, like printf(), or other functions in the same .so.
> > 
> > I think the following assembly gets converted to values that are 2 bigger
> > than they used to be with binutils-2.10.1 ...
> 
> For what it's worth, a coworker found that on sh4,
> binutils as shipped by Hard Hat 2.0, and also
> vanilla binutils 2.13, caused problems with shared libraries.
> binutils 2.13.1 works fine.
> 
> That's neither here nor there, I suppose, but I just wanted
> to point out all was not perfect with the older binutils on sh4.
> - Dan
> 
> 



-- 




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]