This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix toplevel configure for --target TARGET_NAME etc.

From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
To: aoliva at redhat dot com
Cc: jakub at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:21:42 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix toplevel configure for --target TARGET_NAME etc.
References: <20030116171711.K6196@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz><200301161623.h0GGNwL03776@envy.delorie.com><orwul5doo6.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20030116120033.X10012@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <or7kd5dnbn.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

> But why do you need the alternatives?  We've done without them
> perfectly well.

It's not about needing the alternatives, it's about understanding the
options that autoconf will accept anyway.  What we're trying to do
here is remove known options.  Since autoconf allows those options, we
must handle them as well.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix toplevel configure for --target TARGET_NAME etc.
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [PATCH] Fix toplevel configure for --target TARGET_NAME etc.
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix toplevel configure for --target TARGET_NAME etc.
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [PATCH] Fix toplevel configure for --target TARGET_NAME etc.
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [PATCH] Fix toplevel configure for --target TARGET_NAME etc.
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix toplevel configure for --target TARGET_NAME etc.
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]