This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Relocation bug
- From: Ralf Baechle <ralf at linux-mips dot org>
- To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at ds2 dot pg dot gda dot pl>
- Cc: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, cgd at broadcom dot com, rafal at netbsd dot org, Per Fogelström <pefo at opsycon dot se>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:16:07 +0100
- Subject: Re: Relocation bug
- References: <20030223165311.A24279@linux-mips.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1030224155449.27378C-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:09:13PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > > Maciej? Comments?
> >
> > Maciej agrees that this is wrong behaviour.
>
> Hmm, may I speak for myself, please?
Sorry ...
> Anyway, I understand our implementation differs from what IRIX does, but
> I am not that hasty fixing it, either. IOW, if someone writes ld and
> ld.so code that works for both interpretations, I won't object.
>
> > (Eric, cgd - This is also the same thing we were discussing under the
> > subject "R_MIPS_REL64" on the other list, only for o32 this time ...)
>
> You know there are no R_MIPS_REL64 relocs, do you? They used to be
> defined initially, but then they were obsoleted by composed relocations.
> At least the ABI is clear here.
Well, it was the email thread's subject, not content :)
Ralf