This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, carlton at math dot stanford dot edu,gdb <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 12:01:25 -0500
Subject: Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures
References: <ro14r5j1g87.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> <3E88A369.6090403@redhat.com> <3E88AE3F.4030005@redhat.com> <m3brzqzfn5.fsf@workshop.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> <3E89AB79.1060700@redhat.com> <20030401151809.GA20117@nevyn.them.org> <3E89BCB1.3040900@redhat.com> <20030401163348.GA3830@nevyn.them.org>

Don't follow... if you add/remove the NULL so that GDB compiles, it
should work fine.

So your expecting developers to hand edit, re-build, re-test against two trees before committing? That is the only way they can be certain that their GDB change hasn't caused a regression :-/

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]