This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS problems on ppc
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:23:13AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 09:45:24AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > Also, I'd like to hear from Geoff as to why we
> > have both SYMBOL_REFERENCES_LOCAL and SYMBOL_CALLS_LOCAL, introduced
> > by http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2000-10/msg00184.html. They
> > differ in that SYMBOL_REFERENCES_LOCAL doesn't consider STV_PROTECTED
> > syms as local, which seems a bit strange to me.
>
> Oh, nevermind. I'm a dunce. Funny how seeing a testcase fail,
> glibc's elf/vismain.c in this case, makes things obvious. :)
>
The current ld doesn't support visibility very well. In my last
visibility change, I added some more visibility testcases.
H.J..