This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: 64bit bfd_vma vs 32bit address space in linker


On Apr  8, 2003, Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au> wrote:

> Without looking in detail at the code, I believe that bits_per_address
> is exactly the right thing to use to implement the (currently missing
> when BFD64) linker address wrap.

I'm afraid it isn't.  Consider 32-bit code (say o32) running on a
64-bit architecture (MIPS III).  You do want to truncate addresses to
32 bits, since the ABI mandates 32-bit addresses, but bits_per_address
will return 64.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva at {redhat dot com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva at {lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]