This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 05:40:33PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 08:14:57AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 05:09:21AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 10:02:41PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > > > BTW, there may be a small ldxmov/ltoff22x ld bug. Shouldn't we relax > > > > ldxmov/ltoff22x after we finish all brl relaxation? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > I have a patch for that. > > > > > > Eh? I don't think the current relax_section interface > > > supports this. It's not a small problem. > > > > > > > Here is my patch. > > Do you need a generic flag for this? > Ie. can't just elfNN_ia64_relax_section, if it a) has seen any ldxmov > relocs b) would otherwise return FALSE set an IA-64 internal section > flag and return TRUE? > Did you mean like this? H.J.
Attachment:
binutils-final-relax.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |