Re: RFA: Fix readelf -wi test (Was: Re: readelf: apply all rela relocations in the debug_info section)

["H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>]

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 09:38:12AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 10:31:53AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > Hi Joern, Hi H.J.
> > 
> > > > Anyway it looks like we need to reduce the text inside readelf.wi even
> > > > more.  I suspect that the best thing to do would be to delete the test
> > > > entirely.  Do you agree ?
> > > 
> > > It is useful to find regressions like the stray "; ", or readelf giving
> > > extra warning messages.
> > > Till we find someone who volunteers to sort the output intelligently,
> > > we could at least grep for the most salient bits, i.e.:
> > > grep DW_AT_producer < readelf.out > readelf.out2
> > > grep DW_AT_language < readelf.out >> readelf.out2
> > > grep 'DW_AT_name.*: fn' < readelf.out >> readelf.out2
> > > etc.
> > 
> > That would be good.
> > 
> > HJ - Do you still get failures from this test with your x86 Linux
> > build ?  If not, then lets leave the test as it is until someone gets
> > around to rewriting it properly.  Otherwise I will have a go at
> > reworking it to Joern's suggestion.
> 
> I can reproduce them here on gcc 3.2.3pre.  Same symptom; things come
> out in a different order.
> 

I still have the same problem on RedHat 9 with gcc version 3.2.2
20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5).


H.J.