This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: libc divdi3 and libgcc


On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 12:05:59AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> 2003-05-03  H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org>
> 
> 	* elflink.h (elf_merge_symbol): Don't record a hidden/internal
> 	symbol dynamic. Check indirection when removing the old
> 	definition for symbols with non-default visibility.
> 	(elf_add_default_symbol): Skip when told by elf_merge_symbol.
> 
> --- bfd/elflink.h.vsb	2003-05-01 08:59:33.000000000 -0700
> +++ bfd/elflink.h	2003-05-02 23:48:54.000000000 -0700
> @@ -641,7 +641,10 @@ elf_merge_symbol (abfd, info, name, sym,
>        /* Make sure this symbol is dynamic.  */
>        h->elf_link_hash_flags |= ELF_LINK_HASH_REF_DYNAMIC;
>        /* FIXME: Should we check type and size for protected symbol?  */
> -      return _bfd_elf_link_record_dynamic_symbol (info, h);
> +      if (ELF_ST_VISIBILITY (h->other) == STV_PROTECTED)
> +	return _bfd_elf_link_record_dynamic_symbol (info, h);
> +      else
> +	return TRUE;
>      }
>    else if (!newdyn
>  	   && ELF_ST_VISIBILITY (sym->st_other)

Please comment the reason why STV_PROTECTED needs to be treated
specially.  OK to commit with that change.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]