Re: Is glibc branch now frozen?

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>]

On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 07:13:31PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
>  > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 07:27:28PM +0200, Rene Rebe wrote:
>  > > On: Mon, 12 May 2003 23:59:59 +0930,
>  > >     Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>  > > > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 04:02:16PM +0200, Rene Rebe wrote:
>  > > > > unresolvable R_PPC_ADDR32 relocation against symbol `timezone@@GLIBC_2.0'
>  > > > 
>  > > > See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-04/msg00488.html
>  > > 
>  > > In which binutils release should this change show up?
>  > 
>  > 2.14, due out shortly.  Once we finish testing the branch; probably
>  > another week or two.
> 
> Ah, I didn't realize that binutils release was so close.
> 
> I have a patch for the branch that really ought to go in.  rth has
> already seen it and okayed it for trunk and branch, but I haven't
> checked it in yet.  It's a patch to elf_hash(), which can in some
> circumstances return results different from the elf_hash() routine in
> glibc, and thus symbols aren't found in DSOs.
> 
> Is the branch frozen?

Not really.  I don't remember ever seeing your patch; could you post
it?  It sounds like it should be included.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer