This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] CFI directives for GAS
- From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig at suse dot cz>
- To: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 07:38:14 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] CFI directives for GAS
- Organization: SuSE CR s.r.o.
- References: <3EC3BB8D.4080807@suse.cz> <20030516080213.GW957@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <3EC4F25D.3000906@suse.cz> <20030517115530.GC2067@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <3EC8832D.6070501@suse.cz> <20030520000827.GC2085@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>
Alan Modra wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:09:33AM +0200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
Alan Modra told me that:
I'm sure I would if you had attached the patch. :)
I thought I've sent it once again with the patch attached, haven't I?
Did you get it or should I resend it?
I retrieved the patch from the mailing list.
And ... any comments?
I already have an improved version that accepts regnames as %reg (not
only 'reg'), re-uses CIEs if an identical one would be emitted, fixes
one initialization issue and adds new .cfi_register directive.
I'd like to commit either of these versions and continue development
against the base in CVS - it's much easier to maintain then.
Can you approve it or are there some issues that must be fixed before
committing? Or must I wait for another maintainer? Or should I make a
branch for it?
Thanks in advance!
Michal Ludvig