This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Global runtime library search path setting


Ari Pollak <ari@ccs.neu.edu> writes:

> Hi, I am responsible for the gcc & GNU binutils installation on a 100+ 
> Sun Solaris workstation network.
> Both binutils and gcc are installed to nonstandard paths (/arch/gnu, not 
> /usr/local) and this causes problems for programs where -R/arch/gnu/lib 
> is not specified on the command line - e.g. a simple g++ compilation 
> with no arguments except for the input file creates runtime dependencies 
> on libstdc++ and libgcc, which are not usually found if LD_LIBRARY_PATH 
> is not set because it is not currently feasible to put /arch/gnu/lib 
> into the default library search path in Solaris.
> 
> So, the following two possibilities have come up:
> - Make a wrapper script for ld to set LD_RUN_PATH before calling ld if 
> it is not already set
> - Set LD_RUN_PATH for everyone by default
> 
> Which brings me to my question - are both of those acceptable, meaning 
> would they not cause any negative impact on programs?

Yes, either would be a normal way to handle this type of situation.
Most people probably just set LD_RUN_PATH in /etc/profile or
equivalent.

The main disadvantage is that anybody who uses an explict -R option
will have to also explicitly include the entries of LD_RUN_PATH (if
they want them).

> Also, is it at all possible to specify a default library search path at 
> compile-time? If so, how?

This is not supported.  It would be possible to add it.

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]