This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]

From: Jim Wilson <wilson at tuliptree dot org>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 14 Jun 2003 22:58:43 -0700
Subject: Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
References: <20030614032158.GA24639@lucon.org><3EEBA6C7.6010206@tuliptree.org> <20030615041902.GA12909@lucon.org><1055652072.1019.98.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org> <20030615050404.GB13297@lucon.org>

On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 22:04, H. J. Lu wrote:
> Linux kernel never uses the pure ia64 psABI. How about we allow it for
> constant GP and issue an error otherwise?

That is a good point.  The patch looks like a reasonable compromise to
me.

Jim

References:
- [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]