This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [top level] autoconfiscate INSTALL usage
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 10:34:22 -0700
- Subject: Re: [top level] autoconfiscate INSTALL usage
- References: <20030712024024.GA2833@doctormoo>
Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> writes:
> Submitting for general consideration. Plus, it affects a bug. Tested
> on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
I've been wondering for years why GCC 'make install' never used the
perfectly good /usr/bin/install on Linux or Solaris.
> +INSTALL_DATA = @INSTALL_DATA
Typo - need a trailing @.
Do similar patches need to be put into the subdirectory Makefiles, or
do they just take the values of INSTALL_* passed down from the top
level?
zw