This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [RFC] unify dynamic_symbol_p implementations
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 08:26:43AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> Weak defined symbols are purely for link time and only meaningful for
> relocatable inputs.
Hmm, OK. Seems a little odd that we make weak undef dynamic then.
I'm going to install my patch so that x86 and ppc work again. It's
likely that ia64 could use _bfd_elf_symbol_refs_local_p instead of
_bfd_elf_dynamic_symbol_p, but I don't really have the time right
now to figure out what needs doing.
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre