This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Add archive support to ELF

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 03:21:33 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: Add archive support to ELF
References: <20030809004000.GA13996@lucon.org> <m3ekzvs8f4.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20030809061212.GA18859@lucon.org> <m3k79nqrt5.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20030809062331.GC18859@lucon.org>

> What harm will readelf using libbfd do? Is someone planning to remove
> libbfd one day and still want to keep readelf.

More to the point, readelf is useful when implementing bfd bits for a
new architecture. All it does is read the elf bits, not the bfd ones.

-eric

-- 
Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Add archive support to ELF
  - From: H. J. Lu

References:
- PATCH: Add archive support to ELF
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Add archive support to ELF
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PATCH: Add archive support to ELF
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Add archive support to ELF
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PATCH: Add archive support to ELF
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]