This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: STUB_MOVE in elfxx-mips.c


At 01 Oct 2003 09:38:17 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> There was a processor from IDT which has this property.

Could that be construed to say:

        "we should support doing it either way, depending on what CPU
        is being tuned for?"

because if you're going to violate peoples' expectations to implement
an optimization for a specific processor (which ultimately makes the
assembler implementation more complex), then shouldn't you afford that
opportunity for other processors?


No, I don't have a performance bias for either 'add' or 'or' for my
parts.  However, I do have a strong bias against code the implements
things in violation of peoples expectations, and, most especially code
that tells you that two things are the same, when they're not (e.g.,
disassembler).



cgd


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]