This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

"struct sec" -> "struct bfd_section"?


Hello,

What would be the reaction to having "typedef asection"s underlying struct renamed to "struct bfd_section"? The objective here is to make an official namespace-proof opaque declaration available to clients. I asked about "struct sec" and got all sorts of pushback.

A rollout would be as follows:
- #define bfd_section sec
- go through the code base and s/struct sec/struct bfd_section/
- update the definition
It would be phased in over several months.

thoughts?
Andrew


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]