This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
"struct sec" -> "struct bfd_section"?
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 09:25:55 -0400
- Subject: "struct sec" -> "struct bfd_section"?
Hello,
What would be the reaction to having "typedef asection"s underlying
struct renamed to "struct bfd_section"? The objective here is to make
an official namespace-proof opaque declaration available to clients. I
asked about "struct sec" and got all sorts of pushback.
A rollout would be as follows:
- #define bfd_section sec
- go through the code base and s/struct sec/struct bfd_section/
- update the definition
It would be phased in over several months.
thoughts?
Andrew