Re: Subscrubing to bug-binutils (was: Re: [ams@kemisten.nu: BFD broken on GNU/Hurd.])

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>]

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 03:59:42PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 03:16:32PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> > > Since bug-binutils@gnu.org consists of just spam in the archives, I'm
> > > forwarding it to here.  Is bug-binutils@gnu.org used for bug reports?
> >
> > Yes.  Some developers refuse to read bug-binutils because of the spam
> > situation.
> 
> I'm considering subscribing to bug-binutils despite the amount
> of spam, but I can't find usable subscription information.
> 
> The subscription box at
> <URL:http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/> is non-functional.
> It should be removed or possibly the referral info corrected
> (try and subscribe to see that).
> 
> The list bug-binutils is not in the expected place on
> <URL:http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo> (which seems to be
> autogenerated; forcing the obvious list URL doesn't help).
> I've sent a question message to the address on that page.
> 
> Anyone with a clue about subscription for bug-binutils?

It's actually just an alias for bug-gnu-utils, which will be listed.

Be careful, if you use exim or another paranoid MTA.  Things get
through bug-gnu-utils that my MTA (not my spam filters) rejects as
ill-formed.  This bounced me off the list enough times that I got fed
up.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer