This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Problem with recent GNU ld packages
- From: Edouard Gomez <ed dot gomez at free dot fr>
- To: Brian Ford <ford at vss dot fsi dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:48:31 +0200
- Subject: Re: Problem with recent GNU ld packages
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.56.0310201304010.823@eos>
Brian Ford (ford@vss.fsi.com) wrote:
> Yes. See:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-10/msg00467.html
>
> for a discussion.
Thx for the info, but i must confess I'm not very used to binutils or
compiling tools. Though i don't doubt the thread is interesting, I don't
understand most of its content :-)
Btw how should i handle that ?
- forward the bug to the nasm devs because you think it's not caused by
binutils ?
- or wait for someone[1] coming up with a nicer hack in bfd ?
PS: i tested newer versions of nasm and i still have this error.
[1] I don't have the knowledge to fix that myself, sorry :\
--
Edouard Gomez