This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Docs for --unresolved-symbols unclear?
- From: Vladimir Prus <ghost at cs dot msu dot su>
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:30:53 +0300
- Subject: Re: Docs for --unresolved-symbols unclear?
- References: <200312050930.05059.ghost@cs.msu.su> <m3n0a7lg55.fsf@redhat.com>
Hi Nick,
> > That is, I get warning, not error. Without, -Bdynamic, I get error, as
> > expected. I'm using binutils 2.14.90.0.6-3 on Debian, so it might not be
> > the most current version.
>
> Hmm - I do not get this with the 2.14 sources I have here, but they
> are probably slightly different from the Debian ones.
>
> Anyway with the current mainline binutils sources the undefined symbol
> in your test case will produce an error message, rather than a warning
> message, even if -Bdynamic is specified. Hence I think that the
> documentation is now correct.
I've just got the most up-to-date Debian package and it works as you desribe.
Thanks,
Volodya