This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)
- From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:51:16 -0800
- Subject: Re: [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)
- References: <20031125220248.GA967@alinoe.com> <20031126010816.GA13067@lucon.org> <20031126021325.GA12151@alinoe.com> <20031126043049.GA4512@nevyn.them.org> <m37k1njmx4.fsf@redhat.com> <20031126153606.GA10847@nevyn.them.org> <m3oeuzhyu1.fsf@redhat.com> <20031126194452.GA18482@alinoe.com> <20031219180404.GA3867@alinoe.com> <m3iskcx7ht.fsf@redhat.com>
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 07:39:58AM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Carlo,
>
> >> > info as possible ? It seems that including this information is what
> >> > it causing the problem, and ideally what we ought to be doing is
> >> > discarding .gnu.linkonce sections containing debug info, rather than
> >> > retaining them.
> >>
> >> I'd be happy when the info is disregarded. Much better than
> >> assigning it the address of another function.
> >>
> >> Is it possible to do this instead, before 2.14 is released
> >> at large?
> >
> > What is the status of this Problem Report?
>
> Sorry - it has been sidelined whilst I try to get through all of the
> work that boss has assigned to me. I think that the last thing that
> happened was that HJ said that there was a better way to fix the
> problem, but I am not sure if he implemented it.
>
That is the bug we have to live with until SHT_GROUP is used by gcc.
BTW, I am still waiting for a simple testcase to show the problem
with gdb.
H.J.