This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [skanduru@earth.siliconrock.com: VMA different from LMA]

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
To: Srinivasa Kanduru <skanduru at linux dot sadhanapath dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, echristo at redhat dot com, skanduru at siliconrock dot com
Date: 04 Feb 2004 23:03:59 -0500
Subject: Re: [skanduru@earth.siliconrock.com: VMA different from LMA]
References: <20040203195243.GD30065@earth.siliconrock.com><m3smhrc2jc.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><20040205024433.GA17185@linux.sadhanapath.com>

Srinivasa Kanduru <skanduru@linux.sadhanapath.com> writes:

> I assume the address specified in Memory block is LMA and the
> location counter address would be the VMA. Is that correct ?

No, it is not correct.

You can use a MEMORY block to set the LMA if you use AT>, not >.  Read
the documentation I referred you to already:

    http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/docs-2.12/ld.info/Output-Section-LMA.html#Output%20Section%20LMA

Ian

References:
- [skanduru@earth.siliconrock.com: VMA different from LMA]
  - From: Srinivasa Kanduru
- Re: [skanduru@earth.siliconrock.com: VMA different from LMA]
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [skanduru@earth.siliconrock.com: VMA different from LMA]
  - From: Srinivasa Kanduru

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]