This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Misc cleanups

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 06 Feb 2004 15:19:45 -0500
Subject: Re: Misc cleanups
References: <40228465.5080903@codesourcery.com><m3ekt9pfam.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <40235C3C.5060103@codesourcery.com><m3r7x8mf8t.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <4023CAD3.9030904@codesourcery.com><m34qu4m0hl.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com> writes:

> > You're right that one could use -z, and a long sequence of zero
> > bytes is nearly never a valid program, but those don't persuade me
> > as arguments to prevent a port from doing what I did.
> 
> I don't find that wholly confusing

Whoah, I meant to say that I don't find it wholly convincing.

I don't find it confusing at all.  Though some may have found my
statement to be so.

Ian

References:
- Misc cleanups
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: Misc cleanups
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Misc cleanups
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: Misc cleanups
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Misc cleanups
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: Misc cleanups
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]