On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 09:34:03PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> writes:
> - is the theory ok?
Looks good to me.
I think it's a good idea too. I can't see the sense in those bread,
bwrite etc. names though. Why not simply read, write etc.? bfd_bread
and bfd_bwrite were added when I needed to make changes to bfd_read
and bfd_write, but thought it a good idea to keep the old functions
for backward compatibility. Let's not perpetuate silly names.
Hmm, unless some system #define's read, write etc.