This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: FW: Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format?

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: ian at wasabisystems dot com
Cc: fitter20 at hotmail dot com, ddaney at avtrex dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:43:01 -0500
Subject: Re: FW: Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format?
References: <BAY7-F93PCFj2AhGwEU0003be0d@hotmail.com><m3d67srpvz.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><200403050309.i2539iLC020281@greed.delorie.com> <m3wu60q8ll.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

> That is my feeling too.  Unfortunately, the patch is just based on
> an existing global variable, so it doesn't introduce any new
> problems.

I'm not sure I like the idea of propogating a bad interface, but that
does weaken my objections.

References:
- Re: FW: Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format?
  - From: Meg Abyte
- Re: FW: Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: FW: Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: FW: Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]