This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Binutils 2.15

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
To: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts at csv dot ica dot uni-stuttgart dot de>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 10:41:37 -0700
Subject: Re: Binutils 2.15
References: <20040129183201.GA16370@nevyn.them.org> <20040405041030.GA12069@nevyn.them.org> <20040408134211.GA29660@bubble.modra.org> <20040408134527.GA21723@nevyn.them.org> <m3lll6jsm5.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20040408172417.GF27939@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <1081445117.3600.18.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com> <20040408173705.GG27939@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>

On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 10:37, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Eric Christopher wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > > [~300 more] Eric, should we fix mips-ecoff or destroy it?
> > > > 
> > > > I don't think that destroying it would be a very good option.  It's
> > > > still needed for free operating systems that run on DECstations.
> > > 
> > > Which one exactly? I'm not aware of any.
> > > 
> > 
> > netbsd :)
> 
> According to the gas config, netbsd uses fmt=elf (and doesn't match for
> mips_el_, btw.). Is ECOFF used for some bootloader-only stuff?

Yup.

-eric

-- 
Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Binutils 2.15
  - From: Alan Modra

References:
- Re: Binutils 2.15
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Binutils 2.15
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Binutils 2.15
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Binutils 2.15
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Binutils 2.15
  - From: Thiemo Seufer
- Re: Binutils 2.15
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: Binutils 2.15
  - From: Thiemo Seufer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]