This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] Add .secrel32 gas pseudo-op and reloc for ix86 PE
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 11:32:55AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Nick Clifton wrote:
>
> > Brian Ford wrote:
> >
> > >2.) I'm trying to decide what version number should go in the
> > >gcc_GAS_CHECK_FEATURE macro test for .secrel32 in my gcc patch. I assume
> > >if this is not applied to the branch that it should be 2.16.0, otherwise
> > >2.15.0?
> >
> > No - the mainline is 2.15.90 (For various arcane reasons...)
>
> Yes, I saw that. But, it did not change after the above was committed, so
> it is not sufficient. I think I need to know the next version number
> of gas after my change?
>
> Also, I only see one gcc_GAS_CHECK_FEATURE macro that uses a non-zero
> third digit in that version number. Incidentally, that particular one
> uses 2.15.91. Is that the number I need?
>
> Sorry to be so dense, but I haven't been following the binutils version
> numbering scheme.
Yes, using 2.15.91 should work. If you want the check to start
succeeding, there's no big significance to bumping the current number.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer