This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 08:29:01PM -0400, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes: > > > That is fine. What should we call it? bfd_run_over_sections, > > bfd_call_over_sections, bfd_call_on_sections, ... > > By analogy with C++, it should be bfd_sections_find_if, and it should > return the first section for which the function returns true. > I like bfd_sections_find_if. Here is a patch. > bfd_for_each_section is another possibility. > > Or bfd_traverse_sections. > H.J.
Attachment:
bfd-section-if-1.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |