This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: mn10300: relaxing vs section merging
On May 27, 2004, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
> Ok, here is my latest patch. This one I tested with gcc's C
> testsuite, with and without -mrelax, with no failures with that
> weren't also without:
I take it that you didn't test C++? I tried your previous patch with
that, and it still had a few additional failures that weren't present
without -mrelax. I don't see that it would behave any different from
what you last posted. I'll look into it.
+ /* Likewise, do not adjust symbols that won't be merged, or debug
+ symbols, because they too break relaxation. We do want to adjust */
This comment is incomplete.
Other than that, the patch looks good. Please complete the comment,
post the final version and check it in.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}