This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 10:15:52PM -0400, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes: > > > > > Their usages are very inconsistent. I am planning to rename > > > > > > > > #define bfd_section_name(bfd, ptr) ((ptr)->name) > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > #define bfd_section_ident(bfd, ptr) ((ptr)->name) > > > > > > I don't think that is a good idea. If we want to fix the issue of > > > diagnostics, let's fix it. Let's not put in a confusing temporary > > > patch. > > > > bfd_section_ident is intended for diagnostics. > > I can't tell whether you read what I wrote. Let me quote myself from > six lines up: "If we want to fix the issue of diagnostics, let's fix > it. Let's not put in a confusing temporary patch." > Here is the start. I can make other changes to make # objdump -j section work with multiple sections with the same name. H.J.
Attachment:
bfd-sec-ident-1.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |