This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Add bfd_get_section_ident


On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:59:12PM -0400, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> 
> > Here is the start. I can make other changes to make
> > 
> > # objdump -j section
> > 
> > work with multiple sections with the same name.
> 
> bfd_get_section_ident() is a space leak.  It should use bfd_alloc(),
> not bfd_malloc().  If allocation fails, I think it should return NULL,
> not silently return the wrong value.  (This is more or less the
> conversation we just had a couple of weeks ago.)

I can make those changes.

> 
> Now, that said, do we really need two new fields in asection?  That
> can be pretty costly in the linker, with regard to memory space.
> 
> > +void
> > +_bfd_elf_setup_group_pointers (bfd *abfd)
> > +{
> > +  unsigned int i;
> > +  unsigned int num_group = elf_tdata (abfd)->num_group;
> > +
> > +  if (num_group == (unsigned) -1)
> > +    return;
> > +
> > +  for (i = 0; i < num_group; i++)
> > +    {
> > +      Elf_Internal_Shdr *shdr = elf_tdata (abfd)->group_sect_ptr[i];
> > +      Elf_Internal_Group *idx = (Elf_Internal_Group *) shdr->contents;
> > +      unsigned int n_elt = shdr->sh_size / 4;
> > +
> > +      while (--n_elt != 0)
> > +	(++idx)->shdr->bfd_section->group = shdr->bfd_section;
> > +    }
> > +}
> 
> Is the assignment to n_elt correct in always dividing by 4?

Yes. That is in gABI.


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]