This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect


As for who's going to keep it up-to-date, whoever finds that there are
problems in what's in there.

Unfortunately, reality rears it's ugly head - what you suggest hasn't happened - no one cares enough about src/expect/ to fix it. I've even investigated the effort needed to upgrade expect and decided to walk away from the problem - total waste of my time. Far easier to just use the standard expect shipped with the distro's I use. At least the bundled expect works on 64-bit machines like amd64.


Independent of what happens to this thread, I think GDB (and GCC?) should clarify their test procedures so that they don't direct the developer towards src/expect/. (Ben, think of this as plan B, if none of the GNU projects use/recommend src/expect/ et.al., do they still exist? :-)

Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]