This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New port: CRX


On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Nick Clifton wrote:
>  > Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > It (-fvtable-gc semantics) wasn't implemented and (prove me
> > wrong) can probably not be implemented in general, but maybe
> > it's possible for special cases like a chain of single
> > inheritance.  The option -fvtable-gc has been dropped from GCC,
> > and the pseudos are not emitted by GCC in CVS (unless that
> > changed in the last month, but probably not judging from Zack's
> > comment).

(Here referring to gcc-3.0 and later: versions implementing the
"V3 multi-vendor standard C++ ABI".)

> > I suggest new binutils ports should not (have to) implement
> > support for those relocs (and support in old ports be removed
> > some time).
>
> That is fine by me.  I guess that this means that we can delete the
> entire gas/testsuite/gas/vtable directory right ?

Yep.

brgds, H-P


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]