Re: gas, sparc, dwarf2, and R_SPARC_(UA)64

[DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>]

> : DJ wrote:
> : My initial patch did just that (that's why there's a suspiciously
> : lonely looking conditional and recursion there ;)
> 
> It did ?  I must have missed that.  It looked to me like it just
> reinvoked cons_fix_new_sparc() with sparc_no_align_cons set if
> sparc_no_align_cons was clear.

I didn't submit my first pass because it didn't work reliably.

> : but it didn't catch all the cases.
> 
> Do you remember what those cases were ?

Not any more.  I'll try to find time to re-debug.