This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] more x86-64 corrections

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich at novell dot com>, nickc at redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:09:06 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] more x86-64 corrections
References: <s1013005.012@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> <20040723150838.GA587@lucon.org> <20040725164558.GA40155@dragon.nuxi.com>

On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 09:45:58AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:08:38AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > Feel free to submit a patch to do what you prefer as long as it doesn't
> > break gcc for Intel EM64T.
> 
> Intel EM64T is unreleased hardware.  HJ, are you testing on AMD Opteron

It is your lucky day. You can buy Intel EM64T now.

> HW that has been released for over 1 1/2 years??  Keeping Binutils
> working 100% properly on released Opteron should take priority.
>  

I have no ideas what you are talking about.


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] more x86-64 corrections
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

References:
- Re: [PATCH] more x86-64 corrections
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH] more x86-64 corrections
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] more x86-64 corrections
  - From: David O'Brien

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]