This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: relaxation question
- From: Dmitry Dikiy <DmitryD at astrosoft dot ru>
- To: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:12:15 +0400
- Subject: RE: relaxation question
Thanks Alan,
> Yes, in that case the assembler can't do relaxation, and you need to
> implement relaxation in the linker. bfd_relax_section is called for
> each input section in turn, not for each relocation, then if any of the
> calls resulted in "again" being set, the whole process is repeated.
Will be other symbols (for eample located between polymorph and target
label) updated automatically or I have to re-fix them?
Dmitry.