This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [rfa] Add bfd_runtime
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: ian at wasabisystems dot com
- Cc: ac131313 at redhat dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:38:00 -0400
- Subject: Re: [rfa] Add bfd_runtime
- References: <40E1FF7A.10405@redhat.com> <m3smcdajcg.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><40E2CB85.2030607@redhat.com> <m33c4d6rki.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><40EAAF53.8070001@redhat.com> <m3hdsc1vij.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><414F63A3.2050009@redhat.com> <m3acvkzbff.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
> My understanding is that the runtime images which you are talking
> about are just like object files.
Why wouldn't an in-memory execution image be a corefile type? It
can't be *that* different than an on-disk execution image. GDB treats
the two similarly, bfd should too.
And, as a bonus, it's actually in core! ;-)