This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Current binutils failed to build glibc


With the current binutils, glibc failed to build

gcc   -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o
/export/build/gnu/glibc-nptl-3.4/build-i686-linux/elf/librtld.map.o
'-Wl,-('
/export/build/gnu/glibc-nptl-3.4/build-i686-linux/elf/dl-allobjs.os
/export/build/gnu/glibc-nptl-3.4/build-i686-linux/libc_pic.a -lgcc
'-Wl,-)'
-Wl,-Map,/export/build/gnu/glibc-nptl-3.4/build-i686-linux/elf/librtld.mapT
/usr/local/bin/ld: errno: TLS definition in
/export/build/gnu/glibc-nptl-3.4/build-i686-linux/libc_pic.a(errno.os)
section .tbss mismatches non-TLS reference in
/export/build/gnu/glibc-nptl-3.4/build-i686-linux/elf/dl-allobjs.os
/export/build/gnu/glibc-nptl-3.4/build-i686-linux/libc_pic.a: could not
read symbols: Bad value

Although I believe it is a glibc build bug, I was wondering if the
binutils should tolerate this misuse.


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]