This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] PPC64 Replace cmp instructions with cmpw/cmpd
- From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba dot org>, segher at kernel dot crashing dot org,David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead dot org>, anton at samba dot org,benh at kernel dot crashing dot org
- Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 10:52:11 +0930
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC64 Replace cmp instructions with cmpw/cmpd
- References: <16742.10154.523798.177319@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1097228724.318.65.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1097228791.318.67.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <16742.37556.526473.269674@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20041008141942.GC8801@bubble.modra.org> <16743.7342.886240.661541@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
The bone of contention here was tlbie.
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 09:03:10AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Alan Modra writes:
> > 2004-09-09 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
> >
> > * ppc-opc.c (L): Make this field not optional.
>
> OK, could you back it out for me please? Having it mandatory for
> 32-bit cpus is just stupid given that none of them have it anyway. If
> Segher wants to point to the PowerPC AS spec, I would just say that
> that spec is no longer any use as far as 32-bit cpus are concerned,
> since it *requires* a 64-bit implementation. :)
Reverted.
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre