This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] MIPS gas/ld test suite portability fixes


> I meant something like:
> 
> --- tc-mips.c   18 Feb 2005 22:12:50 -0000      1.284
> +++ tc-mips.c   22 Feb 2005 21:54:59 -0000
> @@ -10652,7 +10694,11 @@ mips_after_parse_args (void)
>      }
> 
>    if (arch_info == 0)
> -    arch_info = mips_parse_cpu ("default CPU", MIPS_CPU_STRING_DEFAULT);
> +    {
> +      arch_info = mips_parse_cpu ("default CPU", MIPS_CPU_STRING_DEFAULT);
> +      if (ABI_NEEDS_64BIT_REGS (mips_abi) && !ISA_HAS_64BIT_REGS (arch_info->isa))
> +       arch_info->isa = ISA_MIPS3;
> +    }
> 
>    if (ABI_NEEDS_64BIT_REGS (mips_abi) && !ISA_HAS_64BIT_REGS (arch_info->isa))
>      as_bad ("-march=%s is not compatible with the selected ABI",
> 
> 
> (This fails to compile because arch_info is a constant.)

No, I definitely don't like this. It's going back to the era when
gcc/gas "guessed" what you meant. If we're passing an abi and don't have
a required minimum ISA either passed or by default then we should error
out.

-eric


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]