This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch] was: MIPS assembler no longer "combines symbols in differentsegments"...


Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, David Daney wrote:


I am just trying to obtain a working toolchain.  I prefer to use unpatched
official releases of things whenever possible.  My patch submission was just
an attempt to diverge a little less.


I have the same preferences, but for the toolchain it's not possible for me for a few years already. OTOH, what's wrong with GCC 3.4 that you can't use it? It's been around for about a year and it's pretty stable. You could avoid the problem this way.


I have backported libffi and some libgcj things from a 4.0 snapshot from many months ago into my 3.4. The libffi version that I am using needs the 32bit PC relative relocation. I could get libffi from the current 4.0 and probably solve this part of the problem.


Also for a variety of non-technical reasons we have to support GCC-3.3.1 in adition to using 3.4 It would be nice to use the same binutils version for both.

David Daney


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]