This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Supposedly unsupported targets
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Steve Underwood <steveu at coppice dot org>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, Dmitry <diwil at spec dot ru>
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:22:40 -0500
- Subject: Re: Supposedly unsupported targets
- References: <42443F09.3080202@coppice.org>
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 12:40:41AM +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22nd March a message was posted proposing support for a number of
> targets in binutils be deprecated. The MSP430 was included as an
> unmaintained target. I am puzzled by this. It is very actively
> maintained. Updates for this MSP430 went into binutils not too long ago.
> I have another bunch of updates we are getting ready to submit for new
> parts in the MSP430 family.
>
> Can someone tell me what criteria have been used to draw up the list?
> Has the MSP430 been included by mistake?
Alan wrote:
Some of the targets I put in the dead/maintainerless list are fairly
new. I put them on the list simply because the original contributor
didn't put their name in binutils/MAINTAINERS. Please fix..
Please see:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-03/msg00704.html
Dmitry, do you have commit access? If so, could you commit the patch?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC