This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: Using a shared library to partly replace an archive library - ld changed behaviour
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'H. J. Lu'" <hjl at lucon dot org>,"'Graham Hudspith'" <gwh at allinea dot com>
- Cc: <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:08 +0100
- Subject: RE: Using a shared library to partly replace an archive library - ld changed behaviour
----Original Message----
>From: H. J. Lu
>Sent: 26 April 2005 16:55
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:27:13PM +0100, Graham Hudspith wrote:
>> undefined symbols. When the application invokes one of the "first set of
>> functions", these are caught and implemented by the ARCHIVE library
>> which then goes on to call one of the "second set of functions", also
>> from the archive library. Our shared library is ignored. If we build
>> our shared library by linking it into the archive library first,
>> everything works fine, but this is not what we want.
>>
>
> I am not sure if I understand what you are saying.
I think he's perhaps saying that his users should be compiling their
static libraries with weak symbols, isn't he?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....