This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [RFA] Eliminate warnings about snprintf declaration
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 15:55:23 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Eliminate warnings about snprintf declaration
- References: <01c5570e$Blat.v2.4$1c533160@zahav.net.il> <20050512162453.GA5180@nevyn.them.org> <01c55732$Blat.v2.4$e9bd3640@zahav.net.il> <20050512205103.GB13519@nevyn.them.org> <01c5586c$Blat.v2.4$a7dfc720@zahav.net.il> <20050514141204.GA10684@nevyn.them.org> <01c558a0$Blat.v2.4$2b06ba40@zahav.net.il> <m364xkihbc.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20050515170435.GB11855@nevyn.them.org> <01c55986$Blat.v2.4$2a6b6c20@zahav.net.il>
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 10:40:59PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 13:04:35 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
> > gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org
> >
> > > > bfd/ChangeLog:
> > > > 2005-05-14 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> > > >
> > > > * configure.in: Add snprintf and vsnprintf to AC_CHECK_DECLS.
> > >
> > > These patches are approved, plus the change to libiberty/configure.ac
> > > which needs the obvious ChangeLog entry. Thanks.
> >
> > Eli, please mention regenerating configure in the ChangeLog.
>
> I didn't send patches for the (regenerated) configure and config.in.
> Should I do that, given that I cannot commit them anyway?
No, you don't need to. If you mention them in the ChangeLog, that'll
serve as a hint to whoever commits the patch which files need to be
regenerated.
> > Same comment as above applies; please mention configure.
>
> (And config.in, right?) Will do.
Good catch. Yes, thank you.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC