This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: XCOFF 64 function address wrong?

From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
To: David Lecomber <david at allinea dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 13:56:35 +0100
Subject: Re: XCOFF 64 function address wrong?
References: <1110356435.7150.2.camel@cpc2-oxfd5-5-0-cust103.oxfd.cable.ntl.com> <422EF4B5.2000204@redhat.com> <1110380006.22694.60.camel@delmo.priv.wark.uk.streamline-computing.com> <422F1B92.6000502@redhat.com> <1110390657.8240.13.camel@delmo.priv.wark.uk.streamline-computing.com> <4230228C.5080900@redhat.com> <1110492249.16516.8.camel@cpc2-oxfd5-5-0-cust103.oxfd.cable.ntl.com> <42317797.4030002@redhat.com> <1111593934.6362.27.camel@delmo.priv.wark.uk.streamline-computing.com> <42516876.2050706@redhat.com> <1116260175.13614.0.camel@delmo.priv.wark.uk.streamline-computing.com>

Hi David,

Finally got the chance to check this one, and I can confirm that this
works and has resolved the failure to print 64-bit addresses on AIX 5.2

Good oh - I have checked the patch into the sources.

Cheers
  Nick

References:
- Re: XCOFF 64 function address wrong?
  - From: David Lecomber

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]