This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: some top-level changes

From: Ben Elliston <bje+dated+1120598214 dot a7b07a at air dot net dot au>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 07:16:50 +1000
Subject: Re: some top-level changes
References: <20050630170643.A4871@mailhub.air.net.au><200506302049.j5UKnXmC012925@greed.delorie.com>

> We have a number of other projects listed there that aren't part of
> our source trees (like "hello" or "textutils").  Why can't expect
> and dejagnu have the same status?  Is there any harm in leaving them
> in?  You never know when some third party (Red Hat Inc comes to
> mind) will want to build everything in one tree themselves.

This is the objection I was anticipating and, if that's considered to
be the case, then that's fine.  Patch withdrawn.  :-)

Ben

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- some top-level changes
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: some top-level changes
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]