This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?

On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 01:24:54PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 09:24:03AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:13:43AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > Can you try
> > 
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00767.html
> > 
> > You may have to adjust it a little bit by hand.
> 
> It doesn't solve my issue, though the patch is very usefull, and I would
> recommend it get applied.
> 
> The provide is not early enough, and hppa isn't taking advantage of the
> relaxation pass.
> 
> I would have to write a relaxation handler, which is probably a good
> idea.

Do you have a testcase?


H.J.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]