This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:47:41AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:51:07AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 07:45:00AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > That was a glibc bug. I posted a patch for the linker bug.
> > 
> > There may have been a linker bug, but it doesn't solve the problem.
> > The symbol provide by the linker is still too late for the backend to
> > do anything about the extra reloc space.
> 
> Please try the linker patch with the FIXED glibc.

Could you provide a reference to your libc patch please?

I know you recently posted:
2005-04-13  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
        [BZ #974]
	...

Though it doesn't look like that patch would change the definitions of
the symbols.

I'm a bit confused because it also looks like the definition in 2.3.2
were marked hidden.

c.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]